Miller & Son Paving, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Miller & Son Paving, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors

690 A.2d 711, 547 Pa. 383, 1997 Pa. LEXIS 620

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 31, 1997

DocketPetition No. 740 E.D. Alloc. Dkt. 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 690 A.2d 711 (Miller & Son Paving, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller & Son Paving, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors, 690 A.2d 711, 547 Pa. 383, 1997 Pa. LEXIS 620 (Pa. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 1997, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to whether invalidating a zoning ordinance constitutes an automatic de facto taking. This case is to be orally argued.

Additionally, Wrightstown Township’s Application for Permission to File an Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, 180 E.D. Misc. Dkt.1996, is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 1997, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to whether invalidating a zoning ordinance constitutes an automatic de facto taking. This case is to be orally argued.

Additionally, Wrightstown Township’s Application for Permission to File an Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, 180 E.D. Misc. Dkt.1996, is DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

690 A.2d 711, 547 Pa. 383, 1997 Pa. LEXIS 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-son-paving-inc-v-board-of-supervisors-pa-1997.