Miller & Lux Inc. v. Starkey

California Court of Appeal

Miller & Lux Inc. v. Starkey

127 Cal. App. 79

California Court of Appeal·Decided October 17, 1932·No. Civ. No. 1034·Published

Opinion

BARNARD, P. J.

The respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that no transcript has been filed within the time allowed.

It appears, by certificate of the county clerk, that notice of appeal was filed on June 2, 1932, that no proceedings have been begun for the preparation or settlement of either a transcript or a bill of exceptions, that no such proceedings are pending, and that the time therefor has expired. The motion should be granted. (People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College, 103 Cal. App. 139 [283 Pac. 981].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARNARD, P. J.

The respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that no transcript has been filed within the time allowed.

It appears, by certificate of the county clerk, that notice of appeal was filed on June 2, 1932, that no proceedings have been begun for the preparation or settlement of either a transcript or a bill of exceptions, that no such proceedings are pending, and that the time therefor has expired. The motion should be granted. (People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College, 103 Cal. App. 139 [283 Pac. 981].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Miller & Lux Inc. v. Starkey, 127 Cal. App. 79 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

127 Cal. App. 79 (Miller & Lux Inc. v. Starkey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related