Miller & Lux Inc. v. Starkey

California Court of Appeal

Miller & Lux Inc. v. Starkey

127 Cal. App. 79

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 17, 1932

DocketCiv. No. 1034

StatusPublished

This text of 127 Cal. App. 79 (Miller & Lux Inc. v. Starkey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller & Lux Inc. v. Starkey, 127 Cal. App. 79 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

BARNARD, P. J.

The respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that no transcript has been filed within the time allowed.

It appears, by certificate of the county clerk, that notice of appeal was filed on June 2, 1932, that no proceedings have been begun for the preparation or settlement of either a transcript or a bill of exceptions, that no such proceedings are pending, and that the time therefor has expired. The motion should be granted. (People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College, 103 Cal. App. 139 [283 Pac. 981].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI