Miller & Kearney v. Commissioner
This text of 1977 T.C. Memo. 16 (Miller & Kearney v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FAY,
Petitioner is a California professional corporation engaged in the practice of law. In November 1973 petitioner adopted an employee stock bonus plan, with a plan year extending from February 1 to January 31. On December 12, 1973, an application for a determination letter was filed by petitioner with respondent. *426 The application requested that a determination be made that the plan was qualified and that the accompanying trust was exempt from taxation. This application was submitted prior to the enactment of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and sought a determination that the plan was qualified pursuant to then existing law. 1 No such determination was forth-coming from respondent.
On August 5, 1975, petitioner adopted an amendment to the plan, specifying that the amendment was effective as of December 10, 1973. The changes in this amendment included provisions relating to the allocation of contributions among petitioner's participating employees, the payment of benefits, vesting rights, forfeitures, and termination of the plan.
On March 22, 1976, petitioner adopted a
On May 17, 1976, having failed to obtain a determination from respondent, petitioner filed with this Court a petition for declaratory relief pursuant to section 7476. 2
It is respondent's position that section 7476 is not applicable to the particular plan years before us and that the petition should therefore be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
This issue was previously considered by us in
In the present case, petitioner's plan was adopted on November 30, 1973. The plan years now in issue began in November 1973, February 1974, and February 1975.
Hence, we conclude that the plan involved herein is not among those which are eligible for the new determination procedures under section 7476.
Respondent's motion*428 to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction will therefore be granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1977 T.C. Memo. 16, 36 T.C.M. 81, 1977 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-kearney-v-commissioner-tax-1977.