Miller-Kalama v. Miller

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 2, 2022
DocketCAAP-22-0000391
StatusPublished

This text of Miller-Kalama v. Miller (Miller-Kalama v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller-Kalama v. Miller, (hawapp 2022).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 02-SEP-2022 07:49 AM Dkt. 21 OAWST NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

MELITA M. MILLER-KALAMA and CY KALAMA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TARA KEANUENUELANI MILLER, Defendant-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT HAMAKUA DIVISION (CASE NO. 3DRC-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS (By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, McCullen and Chan, JJ.) Upon consideration of the Stipulation for Dismissal of

Appeal With Prejudice (Stipulation), filed August 29, 2022, by

Plaintiffs-Appellants Melita M. Miller-Kalama and Cy Kalama, the

papers in support, and the record, it appears that (1) the appeal

has been docketed; (2) the parties stipulate to dismiss the

appeal with prejudice and bear their own attorneys' fees and

costs; (3) the Stipulation is dated and signed by counsel for all NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

parties appearing in the appeal; 1 and (4) dismissal is authorized

by HRAP Rule 42(b).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is

approved and the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. The parties

shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are

dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, September 2, 2022.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Presiding Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Associate Judge

1 Plaintiffs-Appellants' counsel, David H. Lawton, and Defendant- Appellee's counsel, William Dean, are cautioned that documents filed through the Judiciary Electronic Filing System shall be signed as provided by the Hawai i Electronic Filing and Service Rules. See Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 32(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Miller-Kalama v. Miller, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-kalama-v-miller-hawapp-2022.