Miller Grocery Co. v. Eastport Sardine Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Miller Grocery Co. v. Eastport Sardine Co.

73 S.E. 554, 10 Ga. App. 287, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 465

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1912

Docket3384

StatusPublished

This text of 73 S.E. 554 (Miller Grocery Co. v. Eastport Sardine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller Grocery Co. v. Eastport Sardine Co., 73 S.E. 554, 10 Ga. App. 287, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 465 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, O. J.

The allegations of the petition were not proved as laid, and it affirmatively appears, from the evidence for the plaintiff, that the offer to buy, made to the defendant by letter, was expressly refused and no complete contract was entered into. A nonsuit was therefore properly awarded. Judgment affirmed.

Attachment; from city court of Albany — Judge Crosland.

February 21, 1911. R. J. Bacon, Ben T. Burson, for plaintiff. Mann & Milner, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, O. J.

The allegations of the petition were not proved as laid, and it affirmatively appears, from the evidence for the plaintiff, that the offer to buy, made to the defendant by letter, was expressly refused and no complete contract was entered into. A nonsuit was therefore properly awarded. Judgment affirmed.

Attachment; from city court of Albany — Judge Crosland.

February 21, 1911. R. J. Bacon, Ben T. Burson, for plaintiff. Mann & Milner, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 S.E. 554, 10 Ga. App. 287, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-grocery-co-v-eastport-sardine-co-gactapp-1912.