Miller, Franzwa Duvar
This text of Miller, Franzwa Duvar (Miller, Franzwa Duvar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-82,588-01
EX PARTE FRANZWA DUVAR MILLER, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W09-40846-J(A) IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital murder
and sentenced to imprisonment for life. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Miller
v. State, No. 05-10-01086-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 10, 2012) (not designated for publication).
Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance.
On April 16, 2014, the trial court entered a timely order designating issues. Applicant has alleged
facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex 2
parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional
facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960),
the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order counsel to
respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any
means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court
may rely on its personal recollection. Id.
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in response to Applicant’s
claims. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it
deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claims for habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
be obtained from this Court.
Filed: January 14, 2015 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Miller, Franzwa Duvar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-franzwa-duvar-texcrimapp-2015.