Miller, Ex Parte Charles Levi

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 24, 2011
DocketAP-76,610
StatusPublished

This text of Miller, Ex Parte Charles Levi (Miller, Ex Parte Charles Levi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller, Ex Parte Charles Levi, (Tex. 2011).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,610

EX PARTE CHARLES LEVI MILLER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 09126 IN THE 90TH DISTRICT COURT FROM YOUNG COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

assault and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment.

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

timely file a notice of appeal. We remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and

conclusions of law.

The trial court has determined that Applicant was denied his right to a meaningful appeal 2

because counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal or otherwise communicate to the court that

his client wished to appeal. We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-

time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 09126 from the 90th Judicial District Court

of Young County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice

of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days

of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If

Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately

appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if

the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that,

should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice

of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Delivered: August 24, 2011 Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Miller, Ex Parte Charles Levi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-ex-parte-charles-levi-texcrimapp-2011.