Miller Et Ux. v. Wayne Title Tr. Co.
This text of 28 A.2d 206 (Miller Et Ux. v. Wayne Title Tr. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from an order refusing judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
The general principles governing such cases are so well established that it would serve no useful purpose to restate them here; nor would that end be served by detailing the facts of the case or the manner in which they are set forth in the pleadings here involved. It is sufficient to say that on appeals from orders of this nature we do not reverse unless it is clear and free *537 from doubt that the court below erred in refusing judgment. On a review of the pleadings as a whole, giving due consideration to the arguments of counsel, we are not satisfied that the court was guilty of error in refusing judgment.
Following the usual course pursued in such cases, we shall not disturb the order appealed from nor discuss the applicable principles of law involved in the case, until an opportunity is had to develop all the facts at trial: Kaster v. Penna. Fuel Supply Co., 300 Pa. 52, 150 A. 153.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 A.2d 206, 150 Pa. Super. 536, 1942 Pa. Super. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-et-ux-v-wayne-title-tr-co-pasuperct-1942.