Miller Electric Co. v. DeWeese

918 A.2d 114, 591 Pa. 396
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 30, 2007·No. No. 26 WAP 2004·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2007, appellant’s application for relief is GRANTED. The concluding sentence of the majority opinion in the above-captioned case, filed October 17, 2006, is hereby amended to read as follows:

Since appellant’s notice of appeal was filed within 30 days of the trial court’s order denying its motion for attorney’s fees, the Superior Court’s order quashing appellant’s appeal is hereby vacated, and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for consideration of the merits.

Order reversed. Case remanded to the Superior Court. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Justice CASTILLE and Justice BALDWIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this application. Former Justice NEWMAN did not participate in the decision of this application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller Electric Co. v. DeWeese, 918 A.2d 114, 591 Pa. 396 (Pa. 2007).

918 A.2d 114 (Miller Electric Co. v. DeWeese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carmen Enters., Inc. v. Murpenter, LLC
185 A.3d 380 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2018)
Edwards, J. v. Agostinelli, E., Sr.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2016
Generation Mortg. Co. v. Bung Thi Nguyen
138 A.3d 646 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)