Miller, Chester Duane
This text of Miller, Chester Duane (Miller, Chester Duane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-16,658-02
EX PARTE CHESTER DUANE MILLER, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 6225-A IN THE 259TH DISTRICT COURT FROM JONES COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and
sentenced to sixty years’ imprisonment.
Applicant alleges the failure to award him good time credits and to adjust his time earning
status violates his right to due process. The habeas court, after receiving an affidavit from TDCJ
detailing the status of Applicant’s time credits, recommends that this Court grant Applicant the time
to which he is entitled. According to TDCJ, Applicant’s time was adjusted in March 2016 to reflect
that he completed an on the job training program in December 2000. 2
This Court does not consider matters such as loss of good time credit, disciplinary
proceedings, and inmate classification by way of a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Palomo, 759
S.W.2d 671, 674 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Ex parte Brager, 704 S.W.2d 46 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986).
Applicant’s claim is not cognizable on habeas corpus. We deny relief.
Filed: June 8, 2016 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Miller, Chester Duane, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-chester-duane-texcrimapp-2016.