Miller Auto Leasing v. Weinstein
This text of 473 A.2d 996 (Miller Auto Leasing v. Weinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MILLER AUTO LEASING COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MARTIN S. WEINSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS LINCOLN HARDWARE & SUPPLY, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges BISCHOFF, PETRELLA and BRODY.
*329 Robert E. Bennett, argued the cause for appellant (Mark R. Silber, attorney; Robert E. Bennett on the brief).
John A. Sweeney argued the cause for respondent (Dietz, Allen & Sweeney, attorneys; John A. Sweeney on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment substantially for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Wells, reported at 189 N.J. Super. 543 (Law Div. 1983).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
473 A.2d 996, 193 N.J. Super. 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-auto-leasing-v-weinstein-njsuperctappdiv-1984.