Millennium Funding, Inc. v. Micfo, LLC

CourtDistrict Court, D. Colorado
DecidedOctober 31, 2022
Docket1:21-cv-01594
StatusUnknown

This text of Millennium Funding, Inc. v. Micfo, LLC (Millennium Funding, Inc. v. Micfo, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Millennium Funding, Inc. v. Micfo, LLC, (D. Colo. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-01594-RBJ Millennium Funding, Inc. et al, Plaintiffs, v. Micfo LLC, Defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACTS, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER OF JUDGMENT

Having considered the evidence and testimony presented at an evidentiary hearing, the arguments of counsel, the briefing, and the governing law, the Court: enters a money judgment against Defendant Micfo, LLC (“Defendant”) in favor of Plaintiffs of $4,200,000.00 in statutory damages for contributory and vicarious infringements of the 48 registered copyrights in Plaintiffs’ 28 movies (“Works”); issues a writ of execution transferring any claims Defendant has against its customers including but not limited to Tefincom S.A. d/b/a NordVPN and Proton Technologies A.G. for breach of terms of service to Plaintiffs so any monetary relief obtained from these claims can used for satisfying the money judgment; and enters the following findings of fact and conclusions

of law. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND A. Plaintiffs and their copyright protected Motion Pictures 1. Plaintiffs MILLENNIUM FUNDING, INC., 211 PRODUCTIONS, INC., BEDEVILED LLC, BODYGUARD PRODUCTIONS, INC., DAY OF DEAD PRODUCTIONS, INC., FAMILY OF THE YEAR PRODUCTIONS, LLC, HUNTER KILLER PRODUCTIONS, INC., I AM WRATH PRODUCTION, INC., KILLING LINK DISTRIBUTION, LLC, LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC., MILLENNIUM IP, INC., MILLENNIUM MEDIA, INC., MILLENNIUM SPVH, INC., MON, LLC, RAMBO V PRODUCTIONS, INC., SF FILM, LLC, VENICE PI, LLC, and VOLTAGE HOLDINGS, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) are owners of 28 copyright protected motion pictures (“Works”) [Ex. P-2] that are currently available for sale in brick and mortal retail stores and for sale and rental in online stores.

See Affs. of Richard Rionda Del Castro [Ex. P-13], Sarah Dunn [Ex. P-16], Paul Hertzberg [Ex. P-15] and Jonathan Yunger [Ex. P-17]. Between the 28 Works, there are 48 copyrights for the motion pictures and screenplays. 2. Plaintiffs engaged the anti -piracy provider PML Process Management Limited (“PML”) among others to monitor peer-to-peer networks for piracy of their Works. See Aff. of Rionda [Ex. P-13], Dunn [Ex. P-16] and Yunger [Ex. P-17]. PML engaged Maverickeye UG (haftungsbeschränkt) (“MEU”) to detect piracy and generate notices to be sent to the service providers assigned Internet Protocol (“IP”) addresses where piracy of Plaintiffs’ Works was confirmed. See Aff. of Daniel Arheidt [Ex. P-12]. B. Defendant and its Customers

3. Defendant is a defunct Infrastructure as a service (IaaS) company that leased servers and IP addresses to customers including Virtual Private Network (“VPN”) providers such as Tefincom S.A. d/b/a NordVPN (“NordVPN”) and Proton Technologies AG. See Complaint [Ex. P-1] at ¶¶30-33; Letter from Christine Brimm of 1/19/2022 [P-7] (“Micfo is currently without a manager”). Defendants’ other customers are unknown. See Aff. of Culpepper [Ex. P-18] at ¶¶9, 30. 4. NordVPN entered into marketing affiliate agreements with operators of numerous piracy websites involved with pirating Plaintiffs’ Works that explicitly promoted NordVPN as a service to “safely” pirate Plaintiffs’ Works. NordVPN paid the operators a commission payment every time one of their website visitors signed up for service with NordVPN using an affiliate link. See Culpepper Aff. [Ex. P-18] at ¶¶14-20. 5. PML sent thousands of notices of infringement to Defendant concerning

ongoing piracy confirmed by MEU to be occurring at IP addresses Defendant had reassigned to customers. PML sent at least 140 notices to Defendant concerning IP addresses that Defendant had reassigned to NordVPN. See Arheidt Aff. [Ex. P-12] at ¶13; Dunn Aff. [Ex. P-16] at ¶¶20-21; Yunger Aff. [Ex. P-17] at ¶¶23-24; Culpepper Aff. [Ex. P-3] at ¶21. 6. Defendant’s customers were required to agree to terms of a Hosting Services Agreement which was in effect while Plaintiffs’ Works were pirated by Defendant’s customers. See [Ex. P-10]. 7. Section 5.4 of the Services Agreement states that “Client shall not use the Services or Infrastructure to transmit, distribute or store material: (a) in violation of any

applicable law…or (d) in a manner that exposes Micfo to…civil liability.” Id. 8. Section 8.4 of the Services Agreement states “The Client shall be solely responsible for any and all loss or damage caused to any third party as a result of access to Micfo’s Services and Hosting Services by any third party…and the Client shall indemnify Micfo and keep Micfo indemnified from and against any liability, actions, claims, costs, charges, expenses and proceedings arising from the same.” Id. C. Plaintiffs’ losses from Defendant’s contribution to its customers’ piracy. 9. Plaintiffs have provided a list of 2021 retail prices for purchasing physical copies of the Works that is shown below. [Ex. P-11]. Motion Picture Prices 211 $7.95 A Family Man $17.02 Angel Has Fallen $11.00 Automata $25.04 Bedeviled $29.98 Before I Go to Sleep $15.99 Boyka: Undisputed IV $11.99 Criminal $29.89 Day of the Dead: Bloodline $13.99 Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Vile and Evil $11.36 Hellboy $16.10 The Hitman’s Bodyguard $14.96 Homefront $25.00 The Humbling $16.30 Hunter Killer $38.85 I am Wrath $15.00 I Feel Pretty $19.02 I Spit on Your Grave $10.79 Kill Chain $21.01 London Has Fallen $9.99 Mechanic: Resurrection $17.99 Once Upon a Time in Venice $17.99 Professor and the Madman, The $11.90 Rambo V: Last Blood $12.40 SKIN $22.80 Status Update $19.98 Survivor $14.99 Welcome Home $10.23 10. The number of Notices sent to Defendant and instances of piracy of the Works confirmed by MEU (“Hits”) is shown below. [Ex. P-11]. MOTION PICTURE NOTICES HITS 211 45 16730 A Family Man 2 4867 Angel Has Fallen 662 7236 Automata 4 4543 Bedeviled 6 1485 Before I Go to Sleep 7 1745 Boyka: Undisputed IV 10 4872 Criminal 15 7620 Day of the Dead: Bloodline 10 9951 Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Vile and Evil 58 6697 Hellboy 510 47747 The Hitman’s Bodyguard 109 46924 Homefront 8 3898 The Humbling 3 1286 Hunter Killer 123 47060 I am Wrath 6 3438 I Feel Pretty 26 27340 I Spit on Your Grave 0 0 Kill Chain 419 4294 London Has Fallen 197 20329 Mechanic: Resurrection 29 16672 Once Upon a Time in Venice 5 7491 The Professor and the Madman 97 12798 Rambo V: Last Blood 400 5588 SKIN 3 2684 Status Update 13 5525 Survivor 7 3721 Welcome Home 29 6031 11. A notice is sent only every 24-72 hours for ongoing piracy of a Work by a specific file. See Arheidt Aff. [Ex. P-12] at ¶11. Accordingly, the hit totals rather than notice totals are more informative of the complete scope of the piracy. 12. MEU also recorded evidence that the motion picture I Spit On Your Grave was pirated from at least 4 Micfo IP addresses. Id. [Ex. P-12] at ¶17. 13. Based upon the retail prices and the number of hits, Plaintiffs assert that they lost revenue of at least $6,210,707.28 from piracy of the Works listed in the Complaint by Defendant’s customers. Plaintiff Millennium Funding, Inc. asserts it lost at least an additional $136,039.38 from piracy of other titles it controls by Defendant’s customers. Plaintiff Voltage Holdings, LLC asserts it lost at least an additional $380,808.20 From piracy of other titles it controls by Defendant’s customers. See Culpepper Aff. [Ex. P-18] at ¶¶40-41; Yunger Aff. [Ex. P-17] at ¶¶31-37; Dunn Aff. [Ex. P- 16] at ¶¶28-30; Hertzberg Aff. [Ex. P-15] at ¶¶17-20; Rionda Aff. [Ex. P-13] at ¶¶16-17. 14. Defendant failed to take any meaningful action in response to the thousands of Notices sent to it by PML because it did not want to interfere with its valuable relationship with its customers. See RFA [Ex. P-4] at ¶¶14, 27, 39. 15. Mr. Golestan, the former manager of Defendant, has been quoted as

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum
719 F.3d 67 (First Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Millennium Funding, Inc. v. Micfo, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millennium-funding-inc-v-micfo-llc-cod-2022.