Millender v. State
326 S.W.3d 560, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1639, 2010 WL 4813718
Opinion
ORDER
Lloyd Millender appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Millender argues he was denied his right to effective assistance of trial counsel. We find the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Millender v. State, 326 S.W.3d 560, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1639, 2010 WL 4813718 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
326 S.W.3d 560 (Millender v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Interest of K.C.H.
326 S.W.3d 560 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)