Milledge v. Grus

135 So. 910, 102 Fla. 497
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 21, 1931·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the final decree appealed from herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

■Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur. Buford, C.J., and Ellis, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Milledge v. Grus, 135 So. 910, 102 Fla. 497 (Fla. 1931).

135 So. 910 (Milledge v. Grus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. Jameson
91 P. 518 (California Supreme Court, 1907)
Smith v. Shackleford
110 So. 358 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Whitson v. Owens
115 So. 512 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
Bryson v. . Lucas
84 N.C. 680 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1881)
Rhode v. Gallat
70 So. 471 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1915)
Partridge v. Hollinshead
30 S.E. 787 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Avery v. Dougherty
2 N.E. 123 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)