Millbrook Investments, N.V. v. Roth

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Millbrook Investments, N.V. v. Roth

469 So. 2d 142, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 304, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12100

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 29, 1985·No. No. 84-1204·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The lower court’s Order of Dismissal With Prejudice is reversed upon a holding that the causes of action alleged in the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint are sufficiently pleaded so as not to be subject to dismissal; that the plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged their standing to bring such action; that the false representations allegedly made by the defendants are not, as a matter of law, nonactionable statements of opinion; and that there is no reason inhering in the alleged transaction between the parties which would legally preclude the action from proceeding.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The lower court’s Order of Dismissal With Prejudice is reversed upon a holding that the causes of action alleged in the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint are sufficiently pleaded so as not to be subject to dismissal; that the plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged their standing to bring such action; that the false representations allegedly made by the defendants are not, as a matter of law, nonactionable statements of opinion; and that there is no reason inhering in the alleged transaction between the parties which would legally preclude the action from proceeding.

Reversed and remanded.

Millbrook Investments, N.V. v. Roth, 469 So. 2d 142, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 304, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12100 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

469 So. 2d 142 (Millbrook Investments, N.V. v. Roth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related