Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Millbrook Investments, N.V. v. Roth

Millbrook Investments, N.V. v. Roth

469 So. 2d 142, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 304, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12100
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 29, 1985
DocketNo. 84-1204
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 469 So. 2d 142 (Millbrook Investments, N.V. v. Roth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Millbrook Investments, N.V. v. Roth, 469 So. 2d 142, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 304, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12100 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The lower court’s Order of Dismissal With Prejudice is reversed upon a holding that the causes of action alleged in the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint are sufficiently pleaded so as not to be subject to dismissal; that the plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged their standing to bring such action; that the false representations allegedly made by the defendants are not, as a matter of law, nonactionable statements of opinion; and that there is no reason inhering in the alleged transaction between the parties which would legally preclude the action from proceeding.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dolan v. State
469 So. 2d 142 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
469 So. 2d 142, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 304, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millbrook-investments-nv-v-roth-fladistctapp-1985.