Millard v. Tuminelli
This text of Millard v. Tuminelli (Millard v. Tuminelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6673
CHARLES MILLARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ARCANGELO M. TUMINELLI,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-970-8-AW)
Submitted: June 25, 2003 Decided: July 15, 2003
Before WIDENER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Millard, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Charles Millard appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Millard v. Tuminelli, No. CA-03-970-8-AW
(D. Md. Apr. 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Millard v. Tuminelli, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millard-v-tuminelli-ca4-2003.