Millard v. Tuminelli

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 15, 2003
Docket03-6673
StatusUnpublished

This text of Millard v. Tuminelli (Millard v. Tuminelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Millard v. Tuminelli, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6673

CHARLES MILLARD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ARCANGELO M. TUMINELLI,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-970-8-AW)

Submitted: June 25, 2003 Decided: July 15, 2003

Before WIDENER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Millard, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Charles Millard appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Millard v. Tuminelli, No. CA-03-970-8-AW

(D. Md. Apr. 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Millard v. Tuminelli, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millard-v-tuminelli-ca4-2003.