Millard v. Board of Com. of Lucas Co.

Lucas Circuit Court

Millard v. Board of Com. of Lucas Co.

7 Ohio Cir. Dec. 115

DecidedFebruary 5, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Ohio Cir. Dec. 115 (Millard v. Board of Com. of Lucas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Lucas Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Millard v. Board of Com. of Lucas Co., 7 Ohio Cir. Dec. 115 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Haynes, J.

Error is brought to reverse the action of the court, of common pleas, in rendering a judgment against plaintiff in error, in an action brought by the board of county commissioners against Millard, in regard to certain fees about which there is a controversy between the commissioners and the plaintiff in error. The case was submitted to us on written briefs, and the brief on one side is the opinion of the court of common pleas.

I have not the ability today to go into this and render a final decision ; nor is it necessary. We have given the matter a very careful examination, and we have had a very full discussion, and are clearly of opinion that the action of the court of common pleas is correct; and the reasons upon which that court proceeded to the judgment against the plaintiff in error are so well stated .in the opinion that was rendered by the judge of that court — which will be found in Com'rs v. Millard, 4 S. & C. P. (15), 419 — that it would be useless for us to attempt to enlarge upon it.

Messrs. King & Tracy, Attys. for Plaintiff in Error. J. A. Barber and O. W. Nelson, Attys. for Defendant in Error.

The "udgment of the court of common pleas will be affirmed, and judgment will be rendered in this case, for costs, against the plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haynes, J.

Error is brought to reverse the action of the court, of common pleas, in rendering a judgment against plaintiff in error, in an action brought by the board of county commissioners against Millard, in regard to certain fees about which there is a controversy between the commissioners and the plaintiff in error. The case was submitted to us on written briefs, and the brief on one side is the opinion of the court of common pleas.

I have not the ability today to go into this and render a final decision ; nor is it necessary. We have given the matter a very careful examination, and we have had a very full discussion, and are clearly of opinion that the action of the court of common pleas is correct; and the reasons upon which that court proceeded to the judgment against the plaintiff in error are so well stated .in the opinion that was rendered by the judge of that court — which will be found in Com'rs v. Millard, 4 S. & C. P. (15), 419 — that it would be useless for us to attempt to enlarge upon it.

Messrs. King & Tracy, Attys. for Plaintiff in Error. J. A. Barber and O. W. Nelson, Attys. for Defendant in Error.

The "udgment of the court of common pleas will be affirmed, and judgment will be rendered in this case, for costs, against the plaintiff in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Ohio Cir. Dec. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millard-v-board-of-com-of-lucas-co-ohcirctlucas-1897.