Millan v. State

135 So. 3d 382, 2014 WL 338744, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1136
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 2014·No. No. 5D12-4490·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order finding Millan in violation of his probation. However, the trial court’s sentencing order must be amended to properly reflect that Millan was sentenced as a Youthful Felony Offender.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of sentencing order.

TORPY, C.J., GRIFFIN and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Millan v. State, 135 So. 3d 382, 2014 WL 338744, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1136 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

135 So. 3d 382 (Millan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Justin C. Millan v. State
247 So. 3d 71 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)