Millan-Colon v. State

152 So. 3d 104, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19354, 2014 WL 6677145
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 26, 2014
DocketNo. 2D13-1823
StatusPublished

This text of 152 So. 3d 104 (Millan-Colon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Millan-Colon v. State, 152 So. 3d 104, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19354, 2014 WL 6677145 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Gregory v. State, 937 So.2d 180, 183 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (“[T]he defendant waived this issue, because he did not request the instruction and assented to the court’s decision to list trespass and battery separately on the verdict form. We have held that this is not fundamental error.”); see also Daniel v. State, 137 So.3d 1181, 1185 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (holding that failure to instruct on trespass as a lesser-included offense three steps removed from armed burglary of a dwelling was harmless because the jury did not exercise its pardon power by finding defendant guilty of any of the lesser-included offenses one and two steps removed).

DAVIS, C.J., and LaROSE and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gregory v. State
937 So. 2d 180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Daniel v. State
137 So. 3d 1181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 So. 3d 104, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19354, 2014 WL 6677145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millan-colon-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.