Millan-Colon v. State

152 So. 3d 104, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19354, 2014 WL 6677145
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 26, 2014·No. No. 2D13-1823·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Gregory v. State, 937 So.2d 180, 183 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (“[T]he defendant waived this issue, because he did not request the instruction and assented to the court’s decision to list trespass and battery separately on the verdict form. We have held that this is not fundamental error.”); see also Daniel v. State, 137 So.3d 1181, 1185 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (holding that failure to instruct on trespass as a lesser-included offense three steps removed from armed burglary of a dwelling was harmless because the jury did not exercise its pardon power by finding defendant guilty of any of the lesser-included offenses one and two steps removed).

DAVIS, C.J., and LaROSE and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Millan-Colon v. State, 152 So. 3d 104, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19354, 2014 WL 6677145 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

152 So. 3d 104 (Millan-Colon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gregory v. State
937 So. 2d 180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Daniel v. State
137 So. 3d 1181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)