Millam v. Northern Freight, LLC

S.D. Illinois

Millam v. Northern Freight, LLC

DecidedMarch 30, 2022

Docket3:20-cv-00797

StatusUnknown

This text of Millam v. Northern Freight, LLC (Millam v. Northern Freight, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Millam v. Northern Freight, LLC, (S.D. Ill. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

WAYNE WHALEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 20-cv-00797-JPG ) NORTHERN FREIGHT, LLC, ) AHMED SANKUS, and ) SAFARA EXPRESS, LIMITED ) LIABILITY COMPANY, ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Wayne Whalen (“Plaintiff") Motion for Leave to file Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 71). Defendant Safara Express (“Safara”) opposes the motion (Doc. 72). Defendant Northern Freight, LLC (“Northern Freight”) and Ahmed Sankus (“Sankus”), all three collectively as (“Defendants”) join Safara’s motion (Doc. 73). Plaintiff seeks to add a party – FedEx Custom Critical, Inc. “There is a presumption that a plaintiff should have an opportunity to test a claim on the merits,” Lee v. N.E. Ill. Reg’l Commuter R.R. Corp., 912 F.3d 1049, 1052 (7th Cir. 2019), so “the court should freely give leave when justice so requires,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). However, the presumption “may be overcome if the court finds . . . futility of the amendment . . . .” Lee, 912 F.3d at 1052–52 (cleaned up). First, Plaintiff has filed the instant motion within the two-year statute of limitations. 1 Additionally, the Court’s current scheduling order (Doc. 66) sets a deadline of July 1, 2022, for

1 This accident occurred on July 21, 2020. any amendments to the pleadings. Thus, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file the amended complaint to add the party is timely. Additionally, the Court will note that any delay is caused, in part, by the fact a proper answer to the complaint by Safara did not occur until December 2021 and Safara’s deposition did not occur until February 9, 2022.

Additionally, Plaintiff’s proposed amended complaint articulates a basis for liability and is not futile. The Court hereby GRANTS Northern Freight and Ahmed Sankus’ Motion to Join the Opposition (Doc. 73), GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 72), and Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file its Third Amended Complaint within 7 days entry of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 30, 2022 /s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

WAYNE WHALEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 20-cv-00797-JPG ) NORTHERN FREIGHT, LLC, ) AHMED SANKUS, and ) SAFARA EXPRESS, LIMITED ) LIABILITY COMPANY, ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Wayne Whalen (“Plaintiff") Motion for Leave to file Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 71). Defendant Safara Express (“Safara”) opposes the motion (Doc. 72). Defendant Northern Freight, LLC (“Northern Freight”) and Ahmed Sankus (“Sankus”), all three collectively as (“Defendants”) join Safara’s motion (Doc. 73). Plaintiff seeks to add a party – FedEx Custom Critical, Inc. “There is a presumption that a plaintiff should have an opportunity to test a claim on the merits,” Lee v. N.E. Ill. Reg’l Commuter R.R. Corp., 912 F.3d 1049, 1052 (7th Cir. 2019), so “the court should freely give leave when justice so requires,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). However, the presumption “may be overcome if the court finds . . . futility of the amendment . . . .” Lee, 912 F.3d at 1052–52 (cleaned up). First, Plaintiff has filed the instant motion within the two-year statute of limitations. 1 Additionally, the Court’s current scheduling order (Doc. 66) sets a deadline of July 1, 2022, for

1 This accident occurred on July 21, 2020. any amendments to the pleadings. Thus, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file the amended complaint to add the party is timely. Additionally, the Court will note that any delay is caused, in part, by the fact a proper answer to the complaint by Safara did not occur until December 2021 and Safara’s deposition did not occur until February 9, 2022.

Additionally, Plaintiff’s proposed amended complaint articulates a basis for liability and is not futile. The Court hereby GRANTS Northern Freight and Ahmed Sankus’ Motion to Join the Opposition (Doc. 73), GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 72), and Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file its Third Amended Complaint within 7 days entry of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 30, 2022 /s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Millam v. Northern Freight, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millam-v-northern-freight-llc-ilsd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack