Mill v. State

60 S.E. 4, 3 Ga. App. 414, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 165
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1908
Docket879
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 60 S.E. 4 (Mill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mill v. State, 60 S.E. 4, 3 Ga. App. 414, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 165 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Powell, J.

Inculpatory admissions, as well as plenary confessions, in order to be admissible against the defendant must be voluntary, and not induced by “the slightest hope of benefit or the remotest fear of injury.” Johnson v. State, 1 Ga. App. 129 and cit.

Judgment reversed.

Accusation of killing hog, -from city court of Wrightsville— ■Judge Faircloth. November 20, 1907. Submitted January 13, Decided January 15, 1908. JE. L. Stephens, for plaintiff in error. J. L. Kent, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bryant v. State
207 S.E.2d 671 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Reliford v. State
113 S.E.2d 473 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
State v. VM JONES
276 P.2d 445 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1954)
Turner v. State
48 S.E.2d 522 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 S.E. 4, 3 Ga. App. 414, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mill-v-state-gactapp-1908.