Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Mill v. State

Mill v. State

60 S.E. 4, 3 Ga. App. 414, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 165
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1908·No. 879·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Powell, J.

Inculpatory admissions, as well as plenary confessions, in order to be admissible against the defendant must be voluntary, and not induced by “the slightest hope of benefit or the remotest fear of injury.” Johnson v. State, 1 Ga. App. 129 and cit.

Judgment reversed.

Accusation of killing hog, -from city court of Wrightsville— ■Judge Faircloth. November 20, 1907. Submitted January 13, Decided January 15, 1908. JE. L. Stephens, for plaintiff in error. J. L. Kent, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mill v. State, 60 S.E. 4, 3 Ga. App. 414, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 165 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

60 S.E. 4 (Mill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryant v. State
207 S.E.2d 671 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Reliford v. State
113 S.E.2d 473 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
State v. VM JONES
276 P.2d 445 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1954)
Turner v. State
48 S.E.2d 522 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1948)