Milkovits v. Merit Systems Protection Board
This text of Milkovits v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Milkovits v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-3212
JOHN MILKOVITS,
Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,
Respondent,
and
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Intervenor.
Donald P. Russo, Law Offices of Donald P. Russo, of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, argued for petitioner.
Joyce G. Friedman, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were B. Chad Bungard, General Counsel, and Calvin M. Morrow, Acting Assistant General Counsel.
Tara J. Kilfoyle, Trial Attorney, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. With her on the brief were Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director and Todd M. Hughes, Deputy Director.
Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-3212
Judgment ON APPEAL from the MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
in CASE NO(S). PH0752070462-I-1
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and LINN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED December 8, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Milkovits v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milkovits-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2008.