Militana v. Kalb
This text of 359 So. 2d 465 (Militana v. Kalb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff Militana seeks to appeal an order granting defendant Kalb’s motion for summary judgment. The order concludes by saying, “Defendant’s Motion for Summary Motion [sic] be and the same is hereby granted.” This is not a final decision, order judgment, or decree within the contemplation of Fla.R.App.P. 3.2(b). Nor is this case properly subject to interlocutory appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 4.2(a). Since we have no jurisdiction, this appeal is dismissed sua sponte. Rizzuto v. DiPaolo, 357 So.2d 490, Case No. 77-1499 (Fla. 2d DCA opinion filed April 19, 1978); Arnold v. Brady, 178 So.2d 732 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
359 So. 2d 465, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/militana-v-kalb-fladistctapp-1978.