Milian v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Milian v. State

92 So. 3d 304, 2012 WL 2913223, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11693

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 18, 2012

DocketNo. 4D11-518

StatusPublished

This text of 92 So. 3d 304 (Milian v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Milian v. State, 92 So. 3d 304, 2012 WL 2913223, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11693 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Luis Santino Milian appeals his convictions and sentences for third-degree grand theft in violation of section 812.014, Florida Statutes (2009), and felony retail theft in concert with others in violation of section 812.015(8)(a). For the reasons set forth in [305]*305Ms co-defendant’s case, Rimondi v. State, 89 So.8d 1059 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), we reverse Milian’s conviction and sentence for third-degree grand theft because it violates double jeopardy, but we affirm his conviction and sentence for felony retail theft.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

TAYLOR, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Luis Santino Milian appeals his convictions and sentences for third-degree grand theft in violation of section 812.014, Florida Statutes (2009), and felony retail theft in concert with others in violation of section 812.015(8)(a). For the reasons set forth in [305]*305Ms co-defendant’s case, Rimondi v. State, 89 So.8d 1059 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), we reverse Milian’s conviction and sentence for third-degree grand theft because it violates double jeopardy, but we affirm his conviction and sentence for felony retail theft.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

TAYLOR, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 So. 3d 304, 2012 WL 2913223, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milian-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.