Milhouse v. O'Brien

586 F. App'x 126
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 2, 2014·No. No. 14-6873·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kareem Milhouse appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part and dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and conclude that Milhouse fails to establish reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mil-house v. O'Brien, No. 1:14-cv-00016-IMK-JES (N.D.W.Va. May 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Milhouse v. O'Brien, 586 F. App'x 126 (4th Cir. 2014).

586 F. App'x 126 (Milhouse v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related