Milhim v. Almo Realty Corp.
188 A.D.2d 450, 592 N.Y.S.2d 594, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13635
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 7, 1992·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover down payments made in connection with two real estate contracts, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.), dated November 16, 1990, which denied their motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We find that there are triable issues of fact. Accordingly, [451] summary judgment was properly denied. Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Milhim v. Almo Realty Corp., 188 A.D.2d 450, 592 N.Y.S.2d 594, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
188 A.D.2d 450 (Milhim v. Almo Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stevens v. Grody
297 A.D.2d 372 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Chadrjian v. Purcell
293 A.D.2d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)