Milgrom v. International Bank of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Milgrom v. International Bank of Miami

436 So. 2d 364, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22571

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 16, 1983

DocketNo. 82-2015

StatusPublished

This text of 436 So. 2d 364 (Milgrom v. International Bank of Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Milgrom v. International Bank of Miami, 436 So. 2d 364, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22571 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment for the plaintiff bank in an action on guaranties was improperly entered below because of the existence of genuine issues as to whether the execution of the agreements had been induced by fraudulent representations, by a contemporaneous oral agreement with which the bank did not comply or both. Public Health Trust of Dade County v. Prudential Ins. Co., 415 So.2d 896 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Furlong v. First National Bank of Hialeah, 329 So.2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 341 So.2d 291 (Fla.1976); Healy v. Atwater, 269 So.2d 753 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). Accordingly, the judgment and a consequent order dismissing the present defendants’ counterclaim with prejudice are reversed and the cause remanded for further appropriate proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment for the plaintiff bank in an action on guaranties was improperly entered below because of the existence of genuine issues as to whether the execution of the agreements had been induced by fraudulent representations, by a contemporaneous oral agreement with which the bank did not comply or both. Public Health Trust of Dade County v. Prudential Ins. Co., 415 So.2d 896 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Furlong v. First National Bank of Hialeah, 329 So.2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 341 So.2d 291 (Fla.1976); Healy v. Atwater, 269 So.2d 753 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). Accordingly, the judgment and a consequent order dismissing the present defendants’ counterclaim with prejudice are reversed and the cause remanded for further appropriate proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

436 So. 2d 364, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milgrom-v-international-bank-of-miami-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack