Milgrom v. International Bank of Miami

436 So. 2d 364, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22571
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 16, 1983·No. No. 82-2015·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment for the plaintiff bank in an action on guaranties was improperly entered below because of the existence of genuine issues as to whether the execution of the agreements had been induced by fraudulent representations, by a contemporaneous oral agreement with which the bank did not comply or both. Public Health Trust of Dade County v. Prudential Ins. Co., 415 So.2d 896 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Furlong v. First National Bank of Hialeah, 329 So.2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 341 So.2d 291 (Fla.1976); Healy v. Atwater, 269 So.2d 753 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). Accordingly, the judgment and a consequent order dismissing the present defendants’ counterclaim with prejudice are reversed and the cause remanded for further appropriate proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Milgrom v. International Bank of Miami, 436 So. 2d 364, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22571 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

436 So. 2d 364 (Milgrom v. International Bank of Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF DADE CTY. v. Prudential Ins. Co.
415 So. 2d 896 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Furlong v. FIRST NATIONAL BK. OF HIALEAH
329 So. 2d 406 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Healy v. Atwater
269 So. 2d 753 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)