Milford v. St. George Recording Equipment Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Milford v. St. George Recording Equipment Corp.

272 A.D.2d 955

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 955 (Milford v. St. George Recording Equipment Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Milford v. St. George Recording Equipment Corp., 272 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, so far as appealed from, modified so as to provide for examination before trial (1) as to the receipt by the plaintiffs of the materials delivered to them by the defendant as alleged in defendant’s second counterclaim and of the use made by plaintiffs of such materials, (2) as to the terms of the agreement dated on or about the 23d day of August, 1945, and as to plaintiffs’ failure, if any, to perform the same; and so as to permit a discovery and inspection of the ten uncompleted intermittents referred to in schedule “E” of plaintiffs’ amended complaint, and as so modified, affirmed, [956]*956without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur. (The portion of the order appealed from denies in part defendant’s motion to examine plaintiffs before trial and for an inspection of materials and records.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Harris, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ. -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, so far as appealed from, modified so as to provide for examination before trial (1) as to the receipt by the plaintiffs of the materials delivered to them by the defendant as alleged in defendant’s second counterclaim and of the use made by plaintiffs of such materials, (2) as to the terms of the agreement dated on or about the 23d day of August, 1945, and as to plaintiffs’ failure, if any, to perform the same; and so as to permit a discovery and inspection of the ten uncompleted intermittents referred to in schedule “E” of plaintiffs’ amended complaint, and as so modified, affirmed, [956]*956without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur. (The portion of the order appealed from denies in part defendant’s motion to examine plaintiffs before trial and for an inspection of materials and records.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Harris, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ. -

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milford-v-st-george-recording-equipment-corp-nyappdiv-1947.