Miles v. Wilson

90 S.E.2d 568, 212 Ga. 60, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 545
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 14, 1955
Docket19132
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 90 S.E.2d 568 (Miles v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miles v. Wilson, 90 S.E.2d 568, 212 Ga. 60, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 545 (Ga. 1955).

Opinion

Wyatt, Presiding Justice.

The act of the General Assembly creating the City Court of Decatur provides that, as to the classes of cases over which the court was to have jurisdiction, the court was to have jurisdiction which should be, “concurrent with the superior court of said county, except such civil courses [sic] of action and such criminal cases, the jurisdiction of which is exclusively conferred by the Constitution and laws of this State upon the superior court.” Ga. L. 1922, p. 248. The Constitution of this State confers exclusive jurisdiction in equity cases upon the superior courts. See Code (Ann.) § 2-3901.

This court in Radcliffe & Lamb v. Varner & Ellington, 56 Ga. 222, 224, said: “Now could May have been made a party at common law? We know of no process by which he could. Provision is made in equity for such cases, but none that we are aware of at law.” Again in Waters v. Perkins, 65 Ga. 32, this court said: *61 “. . . a court of law cannot make new parties to a cause”. See also Brown v. Boynton, 69 Ga. 754. “Where a plaintiff, a non-resident of this State, sues a resident defendant in a court of law which has no- power to make new parties to the action, a court of equity, on a proper case made, will enjoin the proceedings at law so that full relief may be afforded the defendant in the action at law.” Commercial Credit Cory. v. Davis, 207 Ga. 562 (63 S. E. 2d 353).

Since, under the allegations of the petition under review, John Miles is a necessary party in order to try and dispose of all the issues between the parties, and since he is not a party to the suit at law pending in the City Court of Decatur, and since a court of law is without authority to malee him a party, it was not error to grant the temporary injunction in this case.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yandle v. Alexander
156 S.E.2d 504 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
D. H. Overmyer Warehouse Co. v. W. C. Caye & Co.
157 S.E.2d 68 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Moody
156 S.E.2d 117 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Luttrell
147 S.E.2d 647 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Athens Electric Supply Co. v. Delta Oil, Inc.
114 S.E.2d 289 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 S.E.2d 568, 212 Ga. 60, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-v-wilson-ga-1955.