Miles v. Washington

D.C. Circuit

Miles v. Washington

101 F. App'x 359

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 21, 2004

DocketNo. 03-7127

StatusPublished

This text of 101 F. App'x 359 (Miles v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miles v. Washington, 101 F. App'x 359 (D.C. Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 84(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed September 5, 2003 be affirmed. The district court correctly held that a prisoner may not seek relief from his conviction through an action for injunctive relief. See Williams v. Hill, 74 F.3d 1339, 1340 (D.C.Cir.1996) (per curiam). Moreover, to the extent that appellant’s injunctive claims do not concern his conviction, he should pursue them in a separate action.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 84(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed September 5, 2003 be affirmed. The district court correctly held that a prisoner may not seek relief from his conviction through an action for injunctive relief. See Williams v. Hill, 74 F.3d 1339, 1340 (D.C.Cir.1996) (per curiam). Moreover, to the extent that appellant’s injunctive claims do not concern his conviction, he should pursue them in a separate action.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 F. App'x 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-v-washington-cadc-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack