Miles v. Urban Investigations, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Miles v. Urban Investigations, Inc.

168 S.W.3d 727, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1150, 2005 WL 1868717

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 9, 2005

DocketNo. ED 86308

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 168 S.W.3d 727 (Miles v. Urban Investigations, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miles v. Urban Investigations, Inc., 168 S.W.3d 727, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1150, 2005 WL 1868717 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

GLENN A. NORTON, Chief Judge.

Brenda Miles (Claimant) appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (Commission) decision denying her unemployment benefits. Claimant’s notice of appeal to this Court is untimely. As a result, we have no jurisdiction and dismiss Claimant’s appeal.

After Claimant applied for unemployment benefits, a deputy determined that she was eligible for benefits and was not disqualified for her discharge at work. Claimant’s employer, Urban Investigations, Inc. (Employer), appealed the deputy’s determination to the Appeals Tribunal. The Appeals Tribunal reversed the deputy’s determination and concluded Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment because she quit her work without good cause attributable to her work or to her employer. Claimant then filed an application for review with the Commission, who affirmed the Appeals Tribunal’s decision. Claimant filed a notice of appeal to this Court.

Once the Commission’s decision is mailed to the parties, it becomes final ten days thereafter. Section 288.200.2, RSMo 2000. A claimant then has twenty days to appeal a final decision of the Commission. Section 288.210, RSMo 2000. Here, the Secretary for the Commission mailed its decision to Claimant on April 19, 2005. The decision became final ten days later on April 29, 2005. Section 288.200.2. Her notice of appeal was due on May 19, 2005. Section 288.210. Claimant’s notice of appeal was filed on May 21, 2005, which is untimely.

An untimely notice of appeal in an unemployment case deprives this Court of jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Rossi v. Division of Employment Sec., 157 S.W.3d 341, 342 (Mo.App.E.D.2005). This Court has a duty to examine its jurisdiction sua sponte. Frenchie v. Division of Employment Sec., 156 S.W.3d 437 (Mo. App.E.D.2005). We issued an order directing Claimant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed. Claimant has failed to file a response. The unemployment statutes, however, fail to make a provision for the late filing of a notice of appeal. Phillips v. Clean-Tech, 34 S.W.3d 854, 855 (Mo.App.E.D.2000).

The Claimant’s appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and BOOKER T. SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GLENN A. NORTON, Chief Judge.

Brenda Miles (Claimant) appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (Commission) decision denying her unemployment benefits. Claimant’s notice of appeal to this Court is untimely. As a result, we have no jurisdiction and dismiss Claimant’s appeal.

After Claimant applied for unemployment benefits, a deputy determined that she was eligible for benefits and was not disqualified for her discharge at work. Claimant’s employer, Urban Investigations, Inc. (Employer), appealed the deputy’s determination to the Appeals Tribunal. The Appeals Tribunal reversed the deputy’s determination and concluded Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment because she quit her work without good cause attributable to her work or to her employer. Claimant then filed an application for review with the Commission, who affirmed the Appeals Tribunal’s decision. Claimant filed a notice of appeal to this Court.

Once the Commission’s decision is mailed to the parties, it becomes final ten days thereafter. Section 288.200.2, RSMo 2000. A claimant then has twenty days to appeal a final decision of the Commission. Section 288.210, RSMo 2000. Here, the Secretary for the Commission mailed its decision to Claimant on April 19, 2005. The decision became final ten days later on April 29, 2005. Section 288.200.2. Her notice of appeal was due on May 19, 2005. Section 288.210. Claimant’s notice of appeal was filed on May 21, 2005, which is untimely.

An untimely notice of appeal in an unemployment case deprives this Court of jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Rossi v. Division of Employment Sec., 157 S.W.3d 341, 342 (Mo.App.E.D.2005). This Court has a duty to examine its jurisdiction sua sponte. Frenchie v. Division of Employment Sec., 156 S.W.3d 437 (Mo. App.E.D.2005). We issued an order directing Claimant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed. Claimant has failed to file a response. The unemployment statutes, however, fail to make a provision for the late filing of a notice of appeal. Phillips v. Clean-Tech, 34 S.W.3d 854, 855 (Mo.App.E.D.2000).

The Claimant’s appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and BOOKER T. SHAW, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 S.W.3d 727, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1150, 2005 WL 1868717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-v-urban-investigations-inc-moctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack