Miles v. Taylor

Fourth Circuit

Miles v. Taylor

670 F. App'x 79

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 21, 2016

DocketNo. 16-6953

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 670 F. App'x 79 (Miles v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miles v. Taylor, 670 F. App'x 79 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

[80]*80Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Danny McCoy Miles, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miles v. Taylor, No. 1:16-cv-00602-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. July 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[80]*80Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Danny McCoy Miles, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miles v. Taylor, No. 1:16-cv-00602-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. July 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

670 F. App'x 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-v-taylor-ca4-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack