Miles v. State

59 S.E. 274, 129 Ga. 589, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 519
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 16, 1907·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Evans, P. J.

1. In giving a summary of the defendant’s contention, -which if true would acquit him of the crime, the trial judge is not bound to instruct the jury, in immediate connection, that if the enumerated circumstances are found to be true, they should acquit the defendant, where the court charges the law appropriate to the case.

2. - The corpus delicti may be proved by circumstantial evidence, and it is not error for the court to so charge. ,

3. The evidence against the accused, while circumstantial, was sufficient to support the verdict, and the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to set aside the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miles v. State, 59 S.E. 274, 129 Ga. 589, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 519 (Ga. 1907).

59 S.E. 274 (Miles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hilliard v. State
88 S.E.2d 425 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)