Miles v. State

59 S.E. 274, 129 Ga. 589, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 519
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 16, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 S.E. 274 (Miles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miles v. State, 59 S.E. 274, 129 Ga. 589, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 519 (Ga. 1907).

Opinion

Evans, P. J.

1. In giving a summary of the defendant’s contention, -which if true would acquit him of the crime, the trial judge is not bound to instruct the jury, in immediate connection, that if the enumerated circumstances are found to be true, they should acquit the defendant, where the court charges the law appropriate to the case.

2. - The corpus delicti may be proved by circumstantial evidence, and it is not error for the court to so charge. ,

3. The evidence against the accused, while circumstantial, was sufficient to support the verdict, and the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to set aside the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hilliard v. State
88 S.E.2d 425 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 S.E. 274, 129 Ga. 589, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-v-state-ga-1907.