Miles v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Miles v. State

89 So. 3d 967, 2012 WL 1449252, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6634

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 27, 2012

DocketNo. 1D11-6854

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 89 So. 3d 967 (Miles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miles v. State, 89 So. 3d 967, 2012 WL 1449252, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6634 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing and denying the motion for rehearing as untimely. Because the motion for rehearing was untimely, it did not toll the rendition of the final order for purposes of seeking this appeal. Fla. RApp. P. 9.020(h). This appeal is thus untimely and is DISMISSED. Gary v. State, 5 So.3d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

PADOVANO, ROWE, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing and denying the motion for rehearing as untimely. Because the motion for rehearing was untimely, it did not toll the rendition of the final order for purposes of seeking this appeal. Fla. RApp. P. 9.020(h). This appeal is thus untimely and is DISMISSED. Gary v. State, 5 So.3d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

PADOVANO, ROWE, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 So. 3d 967, 2012 WL 1449252, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack