Miles v. State
89 So. 3d 967, 2012 WL 1449252, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6634
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 27, 2012·No. No. 1D11-6854·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing and denying the motion for rehearing as untimely. Because the motion for rehearing was untimely, it did not toll the rendition of the final order for purposes of seeking this appeal. Fla. RApp. P. 9.020(h). This appeal is thus untimely and is DISMISSED. Gary v. State, 5 So.3d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miles v. State, 89 So. 3d 967, 2012 WL 1449252, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6634 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
89 So. 3d 967 (Miles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mark Stucky and Mario Ceresa v. BMW of North America, LLC
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Tyrone Wilkins v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Wilkins v. State
257 So. 3d 1163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)