Miles v. State

964 So. 2d 258, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14534, 2007 WL 2700184
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 18, 2007·No. No. 1D07-0956·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Stanley E. Miles, challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his eleven claims of ineffective assistance of counsel brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We find no error with the trial court’s summary denial of claims one through seven and claims nine through eleven. However, the record attachments do not conclusively refute claim eight. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order as to the summary denial of claim eight and remand with instructions to either attach portions of the record that conclusively refute the claim or conduct an evidentiary hearing. See Peede v. State, 748 So.2d 253, 257 (Fla.1999) (explaining that the summary denial of a rule 3.850 claim may be upheld only if a claim is facially invalid or conclusively refuted by the record).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings.

BARFIELD, DAVIS, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miles v. State, 964 So. 2d 258, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14534, 2007 WL 2700184 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

964 So. 2d 258 (Miles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
69 So. 3d 1034 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Doty v. Florida Department of Corrections
964 So. 2d 258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)