Miles v. State
752 So. 2d 1247, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2286, 2000 WL 257022
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miles v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 839 So. 2d 814 →
Opinion
We affirm the denial of Paul Miles’ post-conviction motion. We note that the motion alleged that Miles had filed a public records request that was still pending when the motion was filed. In the event that his request leads to newly discovered facts within the meaning of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b)(1), affirmance would be without prejudice to file a new motion based on that information. See Buenoano v. State, 708 So.2d 941 (Fla.), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1043, 118 S.Ct. 1358, 140 L.Ed.2d 507 (1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miles v. State, 752 So. 2d 1247, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2286, 2000 WL 257022 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
752 So. 2d 1247 (Miles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Buenoano v. State
708 So. 2d 941 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Griffin-El v. Bowersox
523 U.S. 1042 (Supreme Court, 1998)