Miles v. State

404 So. 2d 778, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21126
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 24, 1981
DocketNo. WW-491
StatusPublished

This text of 404 So. 2d 778 (Miles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miles v. State, 404 So. 2d 778, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21126 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bobbie Paul Miles appeals his convictions on two counts of unlawful sale of a controlled substance, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress tape recordings of conversations between Miles and one of his employees made in Miles’ home. In State v. Sarmiento, 397 So.2d 643 (Fla.1981), and Hoberman v. State, 400 So.2d 758 (Fla.1981), the Florida Supreme Court has held that the Florida Constitution prohibits the warrantless interception of tape recording of a private conversation conducted in the home. None of Miles’ other points on appeal have merit.

Accordingly, the judgment of conviction must be reversed.

BOOTH, SHAW and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoberman v. State
400 So. 2d 758 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
State v. Sarmiento
397 So. 2d 643 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
404 So. 2d 778, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.