Miles v. State

139 So. 572, 24 Ala. App. 595, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 24
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 9, 1932
Docket8 Div. 399.
StatusPublished

This text of 139 So. 572 (Miles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miles v. State, 139 So. 572, 24 Ala. App. 595, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 24 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of violating the prohibition law and appeals.

However much we might be convinced of error in this conviction, we would be without authority to act in the absence of any exceptions or of a request for the general charge.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 So. 572, 24 Ala. App. 595, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-v-state-alactapp-1932.