Miles v. State
139 So. 572, 24 Ala. App. 595, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 24
Opinion
Defendant was convicted on a charge of violating the prohibition law and appeals.
However much we might be convinced of error in this conviction, we would be without authority to act in the absence of any exceptions or of a request for the general charge.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miles v. State, 139 So. 572, 24 Ala. App. 595, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 24 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).
139 So. 572 (Miles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.