Miles v. State

58 Ala. 390
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 58 Ala. 390 (Miles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miles v. State, 58 Ala. 390 (Ala. 1877).

Opinion

BEICKELL, C. J.

The indictment is framed on the supposition that the consent of a man, and a woman, to commit adultery, or fornication, is a conspiracy to commit a misdemeanor, and therefore indictable. We know of no authority for such a proposition; nor, so far as we can discover, was it ever before asserted, except in Shannon v. Commonwealth, 14 Penn. St. 226, and then it received unqualified diSa^pprO-[391]*391bation. So long as tbe parties have proceeded no further than to consent and agree, tbe offense rests in mere intention, and a criminal intent must be accompanied by an act in furtherance of it, before it is tbe subject of indictment.

Tbe judgment must be reversed, and a judgment here rendered discharging tbe appellants from further prosecution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ard v. State
358 So. 2d 792 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1978)
Berness v. State
113 So. 2d 178 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1958)
State v. Aircraft Supplies, Inc.
131 A.2d 571 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
State v. Lennon
67 A.2d 475 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
May v. United States
175 F.2d 994 (D.C. Circuit, 1949)
State v. Nevius
66 N.E.2d 243 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1945)
Old Monastery Co. v. United States
147 F.2d 905 (Fourth Circuit, 1945)
People v. Purcell
26 N.E.2d 153 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1940)
De Graffenried v. State
182 So. 482 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1938)
Gebardi v. United States
287 U.S. 112 (Supreme Court, 1932)
State v. Law
189 Iowa 910 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1920)
McKnight v. United States
252 F. 687 (Eighth Circuit, 1918)
Cole v. State
1917 OK CR 174 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1917)
People ex rel. Sheldon v. Curtin
27 N.Y. Crim. 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Ford v. United States
94 P. 1102 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1908)
United States v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.
146 F. 298 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1906)
State v. Clemenson
99 N.W. 139 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1904)
United States v. Dietrich
126 F. 664 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska, 1904)
State ex rel. Durner v. Huegin
85 N.W. 1046 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Ala. 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-v-state-ala-1877.