Miles v. Maryland Parole Commission
This text of Miles v. Maryland Parole Commission (Miles v. Maryland Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6006
KELVIN J. MILES,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:08-cv-02295-AW)
Submitted: April 22, 2009 Decided: May 26, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kelvin J. Miles, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kelvin J. Miles appeals the district court’s order
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Miles v. Maryland
Parole Comm’n, No. 8:08-cv-02295-AW (D. Md. filed Dec. 17, 2008;
entered Dec. 18, 2008). We deny the motions for appointment of
counsel and for injunctive relief and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Miles v. Maryland Parole Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-v-maryland-parole-commission-ca4-2009.