Miles v. Maryland Parole Commission

Fourth Circuit

Miles v. Maryland Parole Commission

325 F. App'x 222

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 26, 2009·No. No. 09-6006·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kelvin J. Miles appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miles v. Maryland Parole Comm’n, No. 8:08-cv-02295-AW (D. Md. filed Dec. 17, 2008; entered Dec. 18, 2008). We deny the motions for appointment of counsel and for injunctive relief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [223] the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kelvin J. Miles appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miles v. Maryland Parole Comm’n, No. 8:08-cv-02295-AW (D. Md. filed Dec. 17, 2008; entered Dec. 18, 2008). We deny the motions for appointment of counsel and for injunctive relief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [223] the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Miles v. Maryland Parole Commission, 325 F. App'x 222 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

325 F. App'x 222 (Miles v. Maryland Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.