Miles v. Hillman

District Court, S.D. Georgia·Decided July 31, 2023·No. 3:23-cv-00048·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT □ FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 4

DUBLIN DIVISION WB JUL 31 P 248

RODNEY JEROME MILES ) Go Plaintiff, ) V. ) ) CV 323-048 MS. HILLMAN; MS. JACKSON; and ) MS. GARMAN, ) Defendants.

ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, DENIES Plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis, (doc. no. 3). DISMISSES this case without prejudice, and CLOSES this civil action. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with the claims raised in this case, he should be required to initiate a new lawsuit, which would require submission of a new complaint. See Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002). SO ORDERED this _, 3 Ie okt 2023, at Augusta, Georgia. bile

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miles v. Hillman, (S.D. Ga. 2023).

Miles v. Hillman (Miles v. Hillman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

William A. Dupree v. R. W. Palmer
284 F.3d 1234 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)
Slight v. Patton
31 P. 248 (California Supreme Court, 1892)