Miles v. Glen

Fourth Circuit

Miles v. Glen

641 F. App'x 259

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 18, 2016·No. No. 15-7282·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kelvin J. Miles appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Miles v. Glen, No. 2:13-cv-01408-RBH (D.S.C. July 6 and July 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kelvin J. Miles appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Miles v. Glen, No. 2:13-cv-01408-RBH (D.S.C. July 6 and July 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Miles v. Glen, 641 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

641 F. App'x 259 (Miles v. Glen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.