Miles v. Glen
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Kelvin J. Miles appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Miles v. Glen, No. 2:13-cv-01408-RBH (D.S.C. July 15, 2014). We deny the motions for default judgment and to refund fees paid to the district court and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
588 F. App'x 258 (Miles v. Glen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.