Miles v. Gaar, Scott & Co.

121 F. 1020, 57 C.C.A. 679, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4724
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 26, 1903
DocketNo. 1,804
StatusPublished

This text of 121 F. 1020 (Miles v. Gaar, Scott & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miles v. Gaar, Scott & Co., 121 F. 1020, 57 C.C.A. 679, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4724 (8th Cir. 1903).

Opinion

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

This is a writ of error to reverse a judgment which sustained a demurrer to an amended complaint for damages for personal injury against Gaar, Scott & Co., a corporation. The plaintiff was an employé of the purchaser of a threshing machine rig from the defendant, and alleged that he sustained injuries on account of the defective covering of the cylinder. The complaint in this case differs in no material respect from that which has been considered in Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co., 120 Fed. 865, in which the opinion is filed herewith; and the judgment below is reversed, and the case remanded for further proceedings, upon the authority of the opinion in that ease.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.
120 F. 865 (Eighth Circuit, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 F. 1020, 57 C.C.A. 679, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-v-gaar-scott-co-ca8-1903.