Miles v. Clyde

141 S.E. 107, 142 S.C. 475, 1928 S.C. LEXIS 207
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided January 6, 1928·No. 12346·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the'Court was delivered by

Mr. Acting Justice Purdy.

The appeal in this case arises out of a proceeding to foreclose a mechanic’s lien (a law case, Raines v. Sanders, 134 S. C., 284; 132 S. E., 581, and cases cited).

On motion of the attorneys of the defendants respondents, and over the protest of the attorneys for the plaintiff appellant, his Honor Judge Bonham made an order of reference to the Master for Spartanburg County to take the testimony, determine the issues of law and fact, and report the same.

From this order the plaintiff has appealed, and there is only one exception involving the question whether in a case of this kind a compulsory order of reference can be made.

Since a compulsory order of reference cannot be made in a law case (Sumter Hardware Co. v. Fitchette, 133 S. C., 149; 130 S. E., 881. Moody v. Lumber Co., 136 S. C., 327; 134 S. E., 369. Keese v. Parnell 134 S. C., 207; 132 S. E., 620), there was error in granting the order of reference. The exception is sustained, and the order appealed from is reversed and the case remanded to the Circuit Court.

Mr. Chief Justice Watts, and Messrs. Justices Cothran, Brease, and Stabrer concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miles v. Clyde, 141 S.E. 107, 142 S.C. 475, 1928 S.C. LEXIS 207 (S.C. 1928).

141 S.E. 107 (Miles v. Clyde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Raines v. Sanders
132 S.E. 581 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1926)
Sumter Hardwood Co. v. Fitchette
130 S.E. 881 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1925)
Moody v. Dudley Lumber Co.
134 S.E. 369 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1926)