Miles v. Clyde
This text of 141 S.E. 107 (Miles v. Clyde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the'Court was delivered by
The appeal in this case arises out of a proceeding to foreclose a mechanic’s lien (a law case, Raines v. Sanders, 134 S. C., 284; 132 S. E., 581, and cases cited).
On motion of the attorneys of the defendants respondents, and over the protest of the attorneys for the plaintiff appellant, his Honor Judge Bonham made an order of reference to the Master for Spartanburg County to take the testimony, determine the issues of law and fact, and report the same.
From this order the plaintiff has appealed, and there is only one exception involving the question whether in a case of this kind a compulsory order of reference can be made.
Since a compulsory order of reference cannot be made in a law case (Sumter Hardware Co. v. Fitchette, 133 S. C., 149; 130 S. E., 881. Moody v. Lumber Co., 136 S. C., 327; 134 S. E., 369. Keese v. Parnell 134 S. C., 207; 132 S. E., 620), there was error in granting the order of reference. The exception is sustained, and the order appealed from is reversed and the case remanded to the Circuit Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
141 S.E. 107, 142 S.C. 475, 1928 S.C. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-v-clyde-sc-1928.