Miles v. Bowen

115 S.E. 670, 29 Ga. App. 400, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 31
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 10, 1923
Docket13948
StatusPublished

This text of 115 S.E. 670 (Miles v. Bowen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miles v. Bowen, 115 S.E. 670, 29 Ga. App. 400, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 31 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

This was a suit on a note. The trial judge, on motion, properly struck the defendant’s answer] on the ground that it set out no legal defense, and properly disallowed an amendment thereto.

Judgment affirmed.

Boyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. W. B. Hollingsworth, for plaintiff in error. H, A. Allen, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 S.E. 670, 29 Ga. App. 400, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-v-bowen-gactapp-1923.