Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Henry J. Frolich, D/B/A Encino Chemicals

296 F.2d 740, 132 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 122
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 26, 1961
Docket17491_1
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 296 F.2d 740 (Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Henry J. Frolich, D/B/A Encino Chemicals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Henry J. Frolich, D/B/A Encino Chemicals, 296 F.2d 740, 132 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 122 (9th Cir. 1961).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends that appellee’s use of the trademark MILK-O-SELTZER in the sale of a medicinal preparation designed for the relief of headache and upset stomach infringes the appellant’s trademark ALKA-SELTZER, used for the same purposes, and also that such use constitutes unfair competition. The United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division, held to the contrary. We affirm the judgment of the District Court on the basis of the well-reasoned opinion of Judge M. D. Crocker, D.C., 195 F.Supp. 256.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Obolensky v. G.P. Putnam's Sons
628 F. Supp. 1552 (S.D. New York, 1986)
Scott Paper Co. v. Scott's Liquid Gold, Inc.
439 F. Supp. 1022 (D. Delaware, 1977)
Grimes v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance
73 F.R.D. 607 (D. Alaska, 1977)
Blazon, Inc. v. DeLuxe Game Corp.
268 F. Supp. 416 (S.D. New York, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
296 F.2d 740, 132 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-laboratories-inc-v-henry-j-frolich-dba-encino-chemicals-ca9-1961.