Miles, Hiram

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 12, 2014
DocketWR-46,247-11
StatusPublished

This text of Miles, Hiram (Miles, Hiram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miles, Hiram, (Tex. 2014).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-46,247-11

EX PARTE HIRAM MILES, Applicant



ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1996CR0010-W9

IN THE 290TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment.

Applicant alleges that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to inform him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court recommended that relief be granted based on appellate counsel's affidavit. However, Applicant has filed eight previous 11.07 habeas applications regarding this conviction. After a writ challenging a conviction is decided on the merits, every subsequent application must meet an exception to Section 4 of Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.07 to be addressed on the merits. Ex parte Whiteside, 12 S.W.3d 819 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). Applicant relies on a revision to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure which did not take effect until January 1, 2007 as "new law" to meet an exception under Section 4. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The alleged new law does not apply to Applicant's case; therefore he has not shown that he meets an exception to the bar on subsequent writ applications. Therefore, this application is dismissed pursuant to Section 4 of Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.07.

Filed: March 12, 2014

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Whiteside
12 S.W.3d 819 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Miles, Hiram, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-hiram-texcrimapp-2014.