Milea v. City of Syracuse

60 A.D.3d 1386, 874 N.Y.S.2d 843
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 20, 2009
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.3d 1386 (Milea v. City of Syracuse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Milea v. City of Syracuse, 60 A.D.3d 1386, 874 N.Y.S.2d 843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered October 30, 2007 in a personal injury action. The order denied the cross motion of plaintiffs to dismiss as untimely the motion of defendants for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Peradotto, Garni and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 A.D.3d 1386, 874 N.Y.S.2d 843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milea-v-city-of-syracuse-nyappdiv-2009.