Mildred Dunn A/K/A Mildred Garrett A/K/A Mildred Banks v. Park Harbor Improvement Association, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Mildred Dunn A/K/A Mildred Garrett A/K/A Mildred Banks v. Park Harbor Improvement Association, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 10, 2013·No. 01-13-00548-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued October 10, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

appellate record. Park Harbor requests that we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and assess costs against Dunn. We grant the motion.

Dunn has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1). Further, Dunn has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, Dunn filed a response that neither invokes Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1 nor constitutes an adequate response. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1(a)(2)(A), 42.3(b), (c); see also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 132.001 (West Supp. 2012); TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 312.011(1) (West 2005); In re B.N., 303 S.W.3d 16, 18 (Tex. App.—Waco 2009, no pet.); Smith v. Hayes, 597 S.W.2d 488, 489 (Tex. Civ. App.—Fort Worth 1980, no writ).

Accordingly, we grant Park Harbor’s motion and dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion issued October 10, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

appellate record. Park Harbor requests that we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and assess costs against Dunn. We grant the motion.

Dunn has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1). Further, Dunn has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, Dunn filed a response that neither invokes Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1 nor constitutes an adequate response. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1(a)(2)(A), 42.3(b), (c); see also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 132.001 (West Supp. 2012); TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 312.011(1) (West 2005); In re B.N., 303 S.W.3d 16, 18 (Tex. App.—Waco 2009, no pet.); Smith v. Hayes, 597 S.W.2d 488, 489 (Tex. Civ. App.—Fort Worth 1980, no writ).

Accordingly, we grant Park Harbor’s motion and dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

Mildred Dunn A/K/A Mildred Garrett A/K/A Mildred Banks v. Park Harbor Improvement Association, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Mildred Dunn A/K/A Mildred Garrett A/K/A Mildred Banks v. Park Harbor Improvement Association, Inc. (Mildred Dunn A/K/A Mildred Garrett A/K/A Mildred Banks v. Park Harbor Improvement Association, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related